LG Xpression C395 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG Xpression C395 vs. Pantech Renue
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. Pantech Swift
LG Xpression C395
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. Samsung Flight II
LG Xpression C395
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. Pantech Pursuit II
LG Xpression C395
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. Pantech Ease
LG Xpression C395
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. LG Xenon
LG Xpression C395
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Xenon
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Xpression C395 vs. LG Vu Plus
LG Xpression C395
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Vu Plus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
