LG VX8550 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG VX8550 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG VX8550 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG VX8550 vs Samsung Smooth
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs LG enV2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs LG VX8600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs Motorola KRZR K1m
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs LG Chocolate 3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs LG Voyager
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.71 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs LG VX8350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.87 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG VX8550 vs Motorola Adventure V750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment





