LG Shine Touch Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG Shine Touch vs. LG KM555
LG Shine Touch
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. LG KM555E
LG Shine Touch
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
LG KM555E
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. HTC One V
LG Shine Touch
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
HTC One V
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.74 x 2.35 x 0.36 inches inches)
in-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. Samsung Preston
LG Shine Touch
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Samsung Preston
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. HTC Desire Z American Version
LG Shine Touch
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
HTC Desire Z American Version
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. BlackBerry Bold 9790
LG Shine Touch
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
BlackBerry Bold 9790
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- NFC
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG Shine Touch vs. LG Optimus L3
LG Shine Touch
- Small dimensions (4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG Optimus L3
- Too little RAM memory (384 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison

