LG New Chocolate BL20 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG New Chocolate BL40G
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches vs 5.04 x 2.01 x 0.43 inches inches)
in-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG Viewty
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
LG Viewty
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG Chocolate Touch VX8575
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG Chocolate Touch VX8575
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG Renoir
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
LG Renoir
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Features a Xenon flash - better than a standard LED
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG Lollipop GD580
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III mini
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG New Chocolate BL20 vs. LG Chocolate
LG New Chocolate BL20
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.00 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

