LG Neon II Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG Neon II vs. LG Neon
LG Neon II
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Neon
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. LG Xpression C395
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. LG Optimus L3
LG Optimus L3
- Too little RAM memory (384 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. LG Xenon
LG Neon II
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
LG Xenon
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. LG Encore
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. Samsung Corby Plus B3410R
Samsung Corby Plus B3410R
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG Neon II vs. Pantech Renue
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
