LG L343i Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG L343i vs. Sony Xperia tipo
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Xperia tipo
- Low pixel density screen (180 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung GALAXY mini 2
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY mini 2
- NFC
- Low pixel density screen (176 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (133 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Ace
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung GALAXY mini
- Low pixel density screen (127 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
- Small dimensions (4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG L343i vs. Samsung Galaxy S II
LG L343i
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Galaxy S II
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Small dimensions (4.93 x 2.60 x 0.33 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (218 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
