LG KT770 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG KT770 vs. Samsung Ultra S
LG KT770
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG KT770 vs. Nokia 6700 slide US
LG KT770
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches vs 3.75 x 1.81 x 0.63 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
LG KT770 vs. HTC Nexus One US
LG KT770
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
LG KT770 vs. Samsung Omnia W
LG KT770
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Omnia W
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG KT770 vs. Nokia E66
LG KT770
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Nokia E66
- Slow processor (369 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG KT770 vs. Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte
LG KT770
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Nokia 8800 Carbon Arte
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, UMTS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.99 x 0.50 inches inches vs 4.29 x 1.79 x 0.57 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
