LG KM555 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG KM555 vs. LG Shine Touch
LG Shine Touch
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. LG KM555E
LG KM555E
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. Samsung Preston
Samsung Preston
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. LG KM570
LG KM570
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. LG Cookie Lite
LG Cookie Lite
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 3.77 x 2.01 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS
LG KM555
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy S III MetroPCS
- Dual core processor
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG KM555 vs. Motorola MOTOKEY SOCIAL
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.15 x 2.36 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
