LG KM555E Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG KM555E vs. LG KM555
LG KM555E
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. LG Shine Touch
LG KM555E
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG Shine Touch
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.17 x 2.10 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. LG Optimus L5
LG KM555E
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. Samsung Galaxy Pocket Duos
LG KM555E
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Pocket Duos
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. LG Cookie Lite
LG Cookie Lite
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 3.77 x 2.01 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. Samsung Champ Deluxe DUOS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches vs 4.01 x 2.17 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG KM555E vs. Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
LG KM555E
- Small dimensions (4.13 x 2.07 x 0.47 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
