LG GX200 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG GX200 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG GX200 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG GX200 vs Motorola MOTO W233 Renew
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 113 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
Motorola MOTO W233 Renew-specific Pros & Cons
none
LG GX200 vs Samsung B2100
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 113 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 120 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
Samsung B2100-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches)
LG GX200 vs AT&T Z331
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
AT&T Z331-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GX200 vs LG GX300
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
LG GX300-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
LG GX200 vs Nokia C2-00
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches vs 4.25 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia C2-00-specific Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (16 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GX200 vs Sony Ericsson Cedar a
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Cedar a-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GX200 vs Motorola RAZR V3xx
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi)
Motorola RAZR V3xx-specific Pros & Cons
none
LG GX200 vs LG S367
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.29 x 1.89 x 0.51 inches vs 4.61 x 2.00 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (114 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (144 x 176 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GX200-specific Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG S367-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
