LG GT400 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG GT400 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG GT400 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG GT400 vs LG T565
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches vs 4.29 x 2.30 x 0.39 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs LG Cookie Plus
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches vs 4.21 x 2.07 x 0.45 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs Samsung SGH-G800
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs LG Lollipop GD580
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs LG Viewty GT
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs Sony Ericsson Zylo
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs Samsung Corby S3650
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches vs 4.06 x 2.22 x 0.47 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG GT400 vs LG EVE
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GT400-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.21 x 2.15 x 0.46 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call





