LG GB220 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG GB220 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG GB220 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG GB220 vs Samsung SGH-T245G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GB220 vs Nokia 3710 fold
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches vs 3.50 x 1.85 x 0.60 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, UMTS)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GB220 vs Samsung E2530
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 102 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.67 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG GB220 vs LG 220C
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GB220 vs Samsung E2210
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 116 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.73 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GB220 vs LG 420G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GB220 vs Samsung S5511
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.72 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
LG GB220 vs Huawei G7010
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.54 x 1.85 x 0.64 inches vs 4.13 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG GB220-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack





