LG CP150 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG CP150 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG CP150 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG CP150 vs Samsung SGH-A226
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.81 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG CP150 vs Samsung SGH-A117
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.76 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG CP150 vs Samsung SGH-A227
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.79 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG CP150 vs Samsung SGH-A107
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 91 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG CP150 vs Samsung SGH-A137
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi vs 91 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches vs 0.78 inches)
- Low resolution display (128 x 128 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment





