LG C710 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG C710 vs. LG Optimus 7
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. LG Fathom
LG C710
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
LG Fathom
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. LG KC780
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
LG KC780
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. LG Vu Plus
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
LG Vu Plus
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 400 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. Samsung Gravity
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Gravity
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. Motorola XT316
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Motorola XT316
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
LG C710 vs. Samsung GALAXY Pro
LG C710
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
