LG AX300 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to LG AX300 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how LG AX300 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
LG AX300 vs Samsung M370
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300 vs LG Envoy
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 128 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.70 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300 vs Samsung SCH-U340
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.80 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 128 x 160 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300 vs LG Rhythm
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches vs 0.65 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG AX300 vs Samsung Messager Touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG AX300 vs LG Wine II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (0.3 megapixels VGA vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
LG AX300-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion





