LG A200 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LG A200 vs. Samsung E2600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, GPRS)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. Sony Xperia neo L
LG A200
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. LG Optimus L3
LG A200
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG Optimus L3
- Too little RAM memory (384 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. LG T500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. Nokia C2-02
Nokia C2-02
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. Nokia 5230
LG A200
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (128 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Nokia 5230
- Slow processor (434 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LG A200 vs. Nokia C2-05
Nokia C2-05
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

