LAVA XOLO X900 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi vs 306 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels vs 720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D) vs via microUSB)
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Samsung Galaxy S II
LAVA XOLO X900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels)
- NFC
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D) vs via microUSB)
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Micromax A116 Canvas HD
LAVA XOLO X900
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi vs 294 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels vs 720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Apple iPhone 4S
LAVA XOLO X900
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Apple iPhone 4S
- Dual core processor
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi vs 326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels vs 640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Samsung Galaxy S Duos
LAVA XOLO X900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
- Dual SIM card support
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM vs 768 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. Samsung Galaxy Grand
LAVA XOLO X900
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
in-depth comparison
LAVA XOLO X900 vs. HTC One X
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (297 ppi vs 312 ppi)
- High-resolution display (600 x 1024 pixels vs 720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D) vs via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
in-depth comparison
