x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

LAVA Iris 355 LAVA Iris 355


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • The camera lacks flash

LAVA Iris N320 LAVA Iris N320


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 125 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • No front-facing camera

Micromax A35 Bolt Micromax A35 Bolt


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 206 Nokia 206


  • Small dimensions (4.57 x 1.94 x 0.49 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

HTC One HTC One


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (468 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 4 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

LAVA A 16 LAVA A 16


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Dual SIM card support
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 179 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

in-depth comparison



LAVA Iris 351 LAVA Iris 351


  • Dual SIM card support
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Vodafone 360 M1 Samsung Vodafone 360 M1


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 146 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories