LAVA C 30 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
LAVA C 30 vs. LAVA KKT 50
LAVA KKT 50
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LAVA C 30 vs. Pantech Laser
LAVA C 30
- Dual SIM card support
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Lacks an e-mail client
Pantech Laser
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (301 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (3.72 x 1.91 x 0.59 inches inches vs 4.45 x 2.28 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
LAVA C 30 vs. Nokia C2-03
Nokia C2-03
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
