HTC Touch Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Touch vs. HTC ChaCha
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. Sony Xperia tipo
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 180 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. Sony Xperia miro
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. O2 XDA Flame
HTC Touch
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs GPRS, UMTS)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. HTC Touch2
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. BlackBerry Curve 3G
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
HTC Touch
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Quad core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

