HTC Touch CDMA Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Touch CDMA vs. HTC EVO Design 4G
HTC Touch CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC EVO Design 4G
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (275 ppi)
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1200 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. Samsung Omnia II CDMA
HTC Touch CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 208 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. Samsung Brightside
HTC Touch CDMA
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 129 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. Pantech Hotshot
HTC Touch CDMA
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 146 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. HTC One V CDMA
HTC Touch CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC One V CDMA
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (252 ppi)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.74 x 2.35 x 0.36 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. HTC Apache
HTC Apache
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (1.00 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (400 MHz vs 416 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch CDMA vs. HTC Touch Pro2 CDMA
HTC Touch CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (400 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HTC Touch Pro2 CDMA
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (259 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
