HTC Touch 3G Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Touch 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy S III
HTC Touch 3G
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S III
- Very big display (4.8 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Quad core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
HTC Touch 3G
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Nokia C2-03
HTC Touch 3G
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Nokia C2-03
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
HTC Touch 3G
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1536 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.91 x 2.41 x 0.35 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy S Duos
HTC Touch 3G
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Motorola DROID 3
HTC Touch 3G
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Motorola DROID 3
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (275 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Touch 3G vs. Apple iPhone 3GS
HTC Touch 3G
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Apple iPhone 3GS
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Low-resolution video capture
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (143 ppi vs 165 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
