HTC Snap Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Snap vs. HTC S522
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. T-Mobile Dash 3G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. HTC Ozone
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. HTC ChaCha
HTC Snap
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. BlackBerry Curve 8520
BlackBerry Curve 8520
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 512 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 152 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. HTC Snap S510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap vs. Apple iPhone 5
HTC Snap
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
