HTC Snap CDMA Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Snap CDMA vs. Samsung Intrepid
HTC Snap CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Samsung Intrepid
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 157 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. HTC Touch Pro2 CDMA
HTC Snap CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
HTC Touch Pro2 CDMA
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (259 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. Samsung C6625
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 393 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 154 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. Samsung Exec
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. HTC ChaCha
HTC Snap CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. HTC Hero CDMA
HTC Snap CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Snap CDMA vs. Samsung Galaxy Chat
HTC Snap CDMA
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
