HTC S740 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC S740 vs. Nokia 9300i
HTC S740
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Nokia 9300i
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.82 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
HTC S740
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. Siemens SK65
HTC S740
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.86 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. HTC P3470
HTC P3470
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. Motorola RAZR MAXX V6
HTC S740
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. BlackBerry Curve 3G
HTC S740
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S740 vs. HTC S730
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.76 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison

