HTC S620 Excalibur Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. T-Mobile Dash 3G
HTC S620 Excalibur
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. HTC Ozone
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. HTC Snap S510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. Motorola Q9h
HTC S620 Excalibur
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. Nokia E63
Nokia E63
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs UMTS, EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 369 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 169 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 71 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. HTC Snap
HTC S620 Excalibur
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC S620 Excalibur vs. BlackBerry Curve 8520
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (201 MHz vs 512 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 152 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
