HTC Pure Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Pure vs. HTC Touch Diamond2
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. HP iPAQ Glisten
HTC Pure
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ Glisten
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (160 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
in-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. HTC Tilt 2
HTC Tilt 2
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi vs 259 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
in-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. HTC Imagio
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi vs 259 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. Sony Xperia U
HTC Pure
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Xperia U
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi vs 280 ppi)
in-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. Nokia Lumia 820
HTC Pure
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia Lumia 820
- Dual core processor
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HTC Pure vs. Motorola ATRIX 4G
HTC Pure
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (288 MB RAM)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Motorola ATRIX 4G
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution display (540 x 960 pixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi vs 275 ppi)
in-depth comparison
