HTC Ozone Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HTC Ozone vs. T-Mobile Dash 3G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. HTC Snap S510
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. Samsung Saga
Samsung Saga
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi vs 177 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. HTC S620 Excalibur
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A vs EDGE)
- Slow processor (528 MHz vs 201 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. Nokia Asha 302
HTC Ozone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. Motorola Q9m
HTC Ozone
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, EV-DO Rev.A)
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM vs 96 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HTC Ozone vs. HTC Snap
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (528 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (192 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
