HP iPAQ hw6900 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. HP iPAQ Data Messenger
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches vs 0.69 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi vs 142 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. HP iPAQ Glisten
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (416 MHz vs 533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. Samsung GALAXY Note II AT&T
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung GALAXY Note II AT&T
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.5 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (265 ppi)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Supports special active stylus for input
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
- Dual core processor
- Very big display (6.3 inches)
- High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1700 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1536 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. Sony Ericsson P1
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE vs GPRS, UMTS)
- Slow processor (416 MHz vs 208 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
- Quad core processor
- Very fast processor (1600 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Supports special active stylus for input
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HP iPAQ hw6900 vs. HTC Status
HP iPAQ hw6900
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (416 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.71 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 240 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (113 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
More Rivals
