x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

HP iPAQ Voice Messenger Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

HP iPAQ 600 HP iPAQ 600


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Thick body (0.68 inches inches)
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Voice Messenger HP iPAQ Voice Messenger


  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.25 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 160 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10 Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Voice Messenger HP iPAQ Voice Messenger


  • Does not support automatic screen brightness

Garmin-Asus nuvifone A10 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A10


  • The camera lacks flash
  • Single-core processor

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.125 GB RAM vs 0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Latest stories