x We have placed cookies on your device to make your experience better. Find more info here.

HP iPAQ Glisten Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

HP iPAQ Data Messenger HP iPAQ Data Messenger


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 142 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

HP iPAQ 600 HP iPAQ 600


  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 143 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Single-core processor
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

HP iPAQ Voice Messenger HP iPAQ Voice Messenger


  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 167 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy S5


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (432 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



HP iPAQ Glisten HP iPAQ Glisten


  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be

HP Veer 4G HP Veer 4G


  • Small dimensions (3.31 x 2.15 x 0.59 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (160 ppi vs 197 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 240 pixels vs 320 x 400 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Latest stories