HP iPAQ 900 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to HP iPAQ 900 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how HP iPAQ 900 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
HP iPAQ 900 vs HP iPAQ 600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
none
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
HP iPAQ 900 vs HP IPAQ 500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 900 vs Nokia C3
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia C3-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 900 vs Samsung GALAXY Note
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY Note-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very big display (5.30 inches)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (285 ppi)
- High-resolution display (800 x 1280 pixels)
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
