HP iPAQ 900 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HP iPAQ 900 vs. HP iPAQ Glisten
HP iPAQ 900
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 533 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 160 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. Palm Pixi Plus
HP iPAQ 900
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Pixi Plus
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. HP iPAQ 600
HP iPAQ 600
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. LG C205
HP iPAQ 900
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. HP IPAQ 500
HP iPAQ 900
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. Amazon Kindle Fire
HP iPAQ 900
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Amazon Kindle Fire
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi vs 170 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 900 vs. Toshiba PORTEGE G910
HP iPAQ 900
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (163 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Toshiba PORTEGE G910
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
