HP iPAQ 600 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HP iPAQ 600 vs. Sony Ericsson XPERIA X2a
HP iPAQ 600
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X2a
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8.1 megapixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
HP iPAQ 600
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. Sony Ericsson XPERIA X2
HP iPAQ 600
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
Sony Ericsson XPERIA X2
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (292 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8.1 megapixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. LG Optimus G
HP iPAQ 600
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
LG Optimus G
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (4.7 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (318 ppi)
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (13 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
HP iPAQ 600
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Xperia X1
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (311 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches vs 0.66 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. Sony Xperia tipo dual
HP iPAQ 600
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Xperia tipo dual
- Dual SIM card support
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP iPAQ 600 vs. HP iPAQ 900
HP iPAQ 600
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 163 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
