HP iPAQ 600 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to HP iPAQ 600 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how HP iPAQ 600 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
HP iPAQ 600 vs HP IPAQ 500
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 141 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 1.3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 600 vs HTC TyTN II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
HTC TyTN II-specific Pros & Cons
none
HP iPAQ 600 vs HTC P3300 Artemis
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 201 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches vs 0.66 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution video capture
HTC P3300 Artemis-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 600 vs LG GM750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
LG GM750-specific Pros & Cons
none
HP iPAQ 600 vs Nokia 6303i classic
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Nokia 6303i classic-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.28 x 1.82 x 0.46 inches)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HP iPAQ 600 vs Apple iPhone 4S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneHP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Apple iPhone 4S-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
HP iPAQ 600 vs HP iPAQ 900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 163 ppi)
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
none
HP iPAQ 600 vs Palm Pixi Plus GSM
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Palm Pixi Plus GSM-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.37 x 2.17 x 0.43 inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
