HP IPAQ 500 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
HP IPAQ 500 vs. HP iPAQ 900
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HP iPAQ 900
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 163 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP IPAQ 500 vs. Amazon Kindle Fire
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Amazon Kindle Fire
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 170 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
HP IPAQ 500 vs. HP iPAQ 600
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
HP iPAQ 600
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches vs 0.68 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP IPAQ 500 vs. Samsung GALAXY mini
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
HP IPAQ 500 vs. Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 434 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
HP IPAQ 500 vs. Sony Xperia Z
HP IPAQ 500
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Sony Xperia Z
- Quad core processor
- Very big display (5.0 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (443 ppi)
- High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
- Very fast processor (1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
- Water-resistant phone
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison

