HP IPAQ 500 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to HP IPAQ 500 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how HP IPAQ 500 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
HP IPAQ 500 vs HP iPAQ 600
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.68 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 600-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500 vs HTC TyTN II
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 400 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches vs 0.74 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HTC TyTN II-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500 vs LG T315i
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
LG T315i-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.06 x 2.24 x 0.47 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500 vs LG GM750
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 400 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
LG GM750-specific Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500 vs HP iPAQ Voice Messenger
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels vs 240 x 320 pixels)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ Voice Messenger-specific Pros & Cons
none
HP IPAQ 500 vs HP iPAQ 900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi vs 163 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz vs 520 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
HP iPAQ 900-specific Pros & Cons
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
HP IPAQ 500 vs Apple iPhone 4S
Common for both Pros & Cons
noneHP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Apple iPhone 4S-specific Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Thin body, measuring less than 9.5mm/0.37inches (0.37 inches)
- Dual-mode CDMA/GSM phone
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (330 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
HP IPAQ 500 vs RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (1.3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
HP IPAQ 500-specific Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (141 ppi)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.64 inches)
- Low resolution display (176 x 220 pixels)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
RIM BlackBerry Pearl 3G-specific Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)
