General Mobile e-tab 32GB Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. ARCHOS 80 G9
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
ARCHOS 80 G9
- Dual core processor
- No rear camera
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi vs 160 ppi)
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1
- Dual core processor
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi vs 149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. ARCHOS 70b Internet Tablet
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
ARCHOS 70b Internet Tablet
- No rear camera
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi vs 170 ppi)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola XOOM 2 Media Edition
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. Motorola DROID XYBOARD 8.2
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola DROID XYBOARD 8.2
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. Motorola XOOM 2
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Motorola XOOM 2
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1200 MHz)
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi vs 149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
General Mobile e-tab 32GB vs. Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
General Mobile e-tab 32GB
- HDMI connector for TV-out ()
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Samsung GALAXY Note 10.1
- Quad core processor
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Fast processor (1000 MHz vs 1400 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (168 ppi vs 149 ppi)
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
