x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution video capture

Garmin-Asus nuvifone G60 Garmin-Asus nuvifone G60


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 155 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 272 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 180 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Low-resolution video capture

Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10 Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10


  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 267 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution video capture

Garmin-Asus nuvifone M20 Garmin-Asus nuvifone M20


  • Small dimensions (3.75 x 2.07 x 0.50 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 640 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 233 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Asus ZenFone 5 Asus ZenFone 5


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Sony Xperia E dual Sony Xperia E dual


  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories