Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. Garmin-Asus nuvifone A10
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 180 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Garmin-Asus nuvifone M10
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (267 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. Sony Ericsson Xperia active
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Sony Ericsson Xperia active
- Water-resistant phone
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.65 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 192 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. Garmin-Asus nuvifone G60
Garmin-Asus nuvifone G60
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 155 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. HTC Desire X
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
HTC Desire X
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (768 MB RAM)
- Small dimensions (4.67 x 2.45 x 0.37 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. HTC Desire C
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50 vs. Samsung Galaxy Grand
Garmin-Asus nuvifone A50
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
Samsung Galaxy Grand
- Very big display (5.0 inches)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 187 ppi)
in-depth comparison
