x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

GIGABYTE GSmart i120 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

GIGABYTE GSmart i120 GIGABYTE GSmart i120


  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2 GIGABYTE GSmart Mika M2


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • Dual SIM card support
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



GIGABYTE GSmart i120 GIGABYTE GSmart i120


  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Single-core processor
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.77 inches inches)
  • Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

GIGABYTE GSmart Arty A3 GIGABYTE GSmart Arty A3


  • Big display (5.0 inches)
  • Dual SIM card support
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 196 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (64 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Latest stories