GIGABYTE GSmart MW702 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
GIGABYTE GSmart MW702 vs. GIGABYTE GSmart i300
GIGABYTE GSmart i300
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi vs 167 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
GIGABYTE GSmart MW702 vs. GIGABYTE GSmart t600
GIGABYTE GSmart MW702
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (143 ppi)
- The camera lacks flash
GIGABYTE GSmart t600
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (308 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.72 inches inches)
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (520 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
