Eten DX900 Rivals and Competitors
Rivals
Here you'll find the models that our readers have compared to Eten DX900 the most, using our specs comparison tool. Below you will see how Eten DX900 compares to each rival to easily find the key differences between the two.
Click on a rival to jump to it.
Eten DX900 vs GIGABYTE G1345
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Bulky
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900 vs Acer F900
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Eten DX900 vs GIGABYTE GSmart G1317D
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 528 MHz)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900 vs GIGABYTE GSmart S1205
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 416 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900 vs Samsung B7722
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
Eten DX900 vs i-mobile S392
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900 vs ViewSonic V350
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (533 MHz vs 600 MHz)
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Eten DX900 vs ICEMOBILE Twilight
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Eten DX900-specific Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Slow processor (533 MHz)
- Bulky
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.67 inches)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call





