Celkon C90 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Celkon C90 vs. Celkon C5050
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 143 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Celkon A95
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 125 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Celkon C909
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 2.05 x 0.48 inches inches vs 4.53 x 2.05 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Micromax X222
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 2.05 x 0.48 inches inches vs 3.62 x 2.05 x 0.55 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Nokia N73
Celkon C90
- Dual SIM card support
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 2.05 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
Nokia N73
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (UMTS, EDGE)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.74 inches inches)
- Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
Samsung Galaxy Y DUOS
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi vs 127 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Celkon C90 vs. Celkon A99+
Celkon C90
- Small dimensions (3.98 x 2.05 x 0.48 inches inches)
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
Celkon A99+
- Big display (4.3 inches)
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (256 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Slow processor (650 MHz)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual SIM card support
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
More Rivals
