x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)

BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

BlackBerry Style 9670 BlackBerry Style 9670


  • Low-resolution video capture
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches vs 0.73 inches inches)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

Nokia 7205 Intrigue Nokia 7205 Intrigue


  • Small dimensions (3.56 x 1.85 x 0.55 inches)
  • Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 32 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)

BlackBerry Pearl 8130 BlackBerry Pearl 8130


  • Single-core processor
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 32 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels vs 240 x 260 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

BlackBerry Pearl 3G BlackBerry Pearl 3G


  • Small dimensions (4.25 x 1.97 x 0.52 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3.2 megapixels)
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230 BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8230


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • Low pixel density screen (154 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.69 inches inches)
  • Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)

BlackBerry Curve 8320 BlackBerry Curve 8320


  • Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories