BlackBerry 6510 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
BlackBerry 6510 vs. BlackBerry 5810
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry 6510 vs. BlackBerry 6710
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (160 x 100 pixels vs 160 x 160 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry 6510 vs. BlackBerry Z10
BlackBerry 6510
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (160 x 100 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
BlackBerry Z10
- High-resolution display (768 x 1280 pixels)
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (356 ppi)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Dual core processor
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
Common for both Pros & Cons
nonein-depth comparison
BlackBerry 6510 vs. Nokia Asha 302
BlackBerry 6510
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (160 x 100 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 302
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry 6510 vs. Nokia Asha 201
BlackBerry 6510
- No rear camera
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (160 x 100 pixels)
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Nokia Asha 201
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE, GPRS)
- Low pixel density screen (167 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
BlackBerry 6510 vs. Handspring Treo 180
Handspring Treo 180
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Common for both Pros & Cons
- No rear camera
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.95 inches inches vs 0.70 inches inches)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
