Asus VivoTab Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Asus VivoTab vs. Microsoft Surface Pro
Asus VivoTab
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi)
Microsoft Surface Pro
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz vs 1700 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM vs 4096 MB RAM)
- Supports special active stylus for input
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Samsung ATIV Smart PC Pro
Asus VivoTab
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz)
- NFC
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi)
Samsung ATIV Smart PC Pro
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an e-mail client
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM vs 4096 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D) vs )
- Supports special active stylus for input
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Samsung ATIV Smart PC
Samsung ATIV Smart PC
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D) vs Mini HDMI (Type C))
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Asus VivoTab Smart
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi vs 155 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Acer Iconia W700
Asus VivoTab
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- NFC
- Supports special active stylus for input
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi)
Acer Iconia W700
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM vs 4096 MB RAM)
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Acer Iconia W510
Acer Iconia W510
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz vs 1500 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi vs 155 ppi)
in-depth comparison
Asus VivoTab vs. Microsoft Surface RT
Asus VivoTab
- Dual core processor
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- NFC
- HDMI connector for TV-out (Micro HDMI (Type D))
- Supports special active stylus for input
Microsoft Surface RT
- Quad core processor
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Very fast processor (1800 MHz vs 1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (135 ppi vs 148 ppi)
in-depth comparison
