Asus P565 Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Asus P565 vs. Asus M930
Asus P565
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Asus M930
- Slow processor (450 MHz)
- It is so thick it needs a personal fitness trainer (0.73 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (179 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Asus P565 vs. Asus P526
Asus P526
- Lacks Wi-Fi
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Asus P565 vs. Samsung GALAXY Fit
Asus P565
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Samsung GALAXY Fit
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (121 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Asus P565 vs. Sony Xperia miro
Asus P565
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
Sony Xperia miro
- Small dimensions (4.45 x 2.34 x 0.39 inches inches)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
in-depth comparison
Asus P565 vs. Asus P320
Asus P320
- Slow data means slow Internet browsing (EDGE)
- Slow processor (200 MHz)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (154 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 64 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels vs 2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
Asus P565 vs. Asus P835
Asus P565
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- High pixel densitiy screen, over 250ppi (286 ppi vs 267 ppi)
- Resistive touchscreen technology means its display is less sensitive than you would like it to be
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 288 MB RAM)
- Lacks a standard (3.5mm) headphones jack
- Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
in-depth comparison
