x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 5th generation Apple iPod touch 5th generation


  • High pixel densitiy screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Motorola Moto G Motorola Moto G


  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel densitiy screen (329 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 4th generation Apple iPod touch 4th generation


  • High pixel densitiy screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Lacks an e-mail client

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S5 Samsung Galaxy S5


  • Big display (5.1 inches)
  • High-resolution display (1080 x 1920 pixels)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen, over 430ppi (432 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Quad core processor
  • Lots of RAM (2048 MB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Water-resistant phone

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Lacks an e-mail client
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 196 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 1024 MB RAM)
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories