x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 6th generation Apple iPod touch 6th generation


  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 5th generation Apple iPod touch 5th generation


  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 4th generation Apple iPod touch 4th generation


  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • No rear camera
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Samsung Galaxy S6 Samsung Galaxy S6


  • Lightweight phone
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (577 ppi)
  • High-resolution camera (16 megapixels)
  • Lots of RAM (3 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.27 inches)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches vs 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch Apple iPod touch


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

LG G3 LG G3


  • Lightweight phone
  • Big display (5.5 inches)
  • Extremely high pixel density screen (538 ppi)
  • High screen-to-body ratio (75.22 %)
  • Lots of RAM (3 GB RAM)
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories