x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Apple iPod touch 3rd generation


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 4th generation Apple iPod touch 4th generation


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.28 inches)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM vs 128 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Apple iPod touch 3rd generation


  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM)
  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 5th generation Apple iPod touch 5th generation


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Apple iPod touch 3rd generation


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPod touch 6th generation Apple iPod touch 6th generation


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Thin body, measuring less than 7.5mm/0.3inches (0.24 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM vs 1024 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM vs 128 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Apple iPod touch 3rd generation


  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches)
  • No rear camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Apple iPhone 3GS Apple iPhone 3GS


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Apple iPod touch 3rd generation Apple iPod touch 3rd generation


  • No rear camera
  • No front-facing camera
  • Lacks global positioning system (GPS)

Apple iPhone 4 Apple iPhone 4


  • Large pixel size (1.75 μm)
  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (5 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Lots of RAM (256 GB RAM vs 512 GB RAM)
  • Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches vs 4.50 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories