Apple iPod touch 2nd generation Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPod touch 3rd generation
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPod touch 4th generation
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPod touch 4th generation
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches vs 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.28 inches inches)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPod touch 5th generation
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPod touch 5th generation
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches vs 4.86 x 2.31 x 0.24 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPod touch
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches vs 4.30 x 2.40 x 0.31 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPhone 3GS
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Apple iPhone 3GS
- Slow processor (600 MHz)
- Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Low-resolution video capture
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPad mini
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches)
- No rear camera
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Apple iPad mini
- Dual core processor
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- The camera lacks flash
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi vs 162 ppi)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation vs. Apple iPhone 4S
Apple iPod touch 2nd generation
- No rear camera
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- No front-facing camera
- Lacks global positioning system (GPS)
Apple iPhone 4S
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Small dimensions (4.30 x 2.40 x 0.33 inches inches vs 4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
