Apple iPhone 3G Rivals and Competitors
Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Apple iPhone 3GS
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (412 MHz vs 600 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM vs 256 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels vs 3 megapixels)
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Apple iPhone 4S
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 4S
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Small dimensions (4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Apple iPhone 4
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 4
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 960 pixels)
- Fast processor (1000 MHz)
- Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
Apple iPhone 5
- Dual core processor
- Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (326 ppi)
- High-resolution display (640 x 1136 pixels)
- High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
- Very fast processor (1300 MHz)
- Lots of RAM (1016 MB RAM)
- Fast mobile data support (4G)
- Small dimensions (4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches inches)
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Apple iPhone
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy Y
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Galaxy Y
- Small dimensions (4.09 x 2.28 x 0.45 inches inches)
- Low resolution display (240 x 320 pixels)
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi vs 133 ppi)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
Apple iPhone 3G vs. Samsung Galaxy Ace
Apple iPhone 3G
- Slow processor (412 MHz)
- Too little RAM memory (128 MB RAM)
- Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)
- The camera lacks autofocus
- The camera lacks flash
- Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
- Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB
Samsung Galaxy Ace
- Low-resolution video capture
- Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
Common for both Pros & Cons
- Low pixel densitiy screen, below 180ppi (165 ppi)
- No front-facing camera
in-depth comparison
