x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Alcatel OneTouch Fire Rivals and Competitors

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

ZTE Open ZTE Open


none

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OneTouch Fire Alcatel OneTouch Fire


  • Single-core processor

Alcatel OneTouch Fire C Alcatel OneTouch Fire C


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 0.3 megapixels VGA)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison




Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OneTouch Fire Alcatel OneTouch Fire


  • Single-core processor
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Alcatel OneTouch Fire E Alcatel OneTouch Fire E


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Small dimensions (5.08 x 2.50 x 0.32 inches)
  • Lacks an ambient light sensor for automatic screen brightness adjustment
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 245 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OneTouch Fire Alcatel OneTouch Fire


  • Single-core processor
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Low-resolution video capture

Nokia Lumia 520 Nokia Lumia 520


  • Fast mobile data support (4G)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi vs 235 ppi)
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels vs 480 x 800 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks flash
  • No front-facing camera

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OneTouch Fire Alcatel OneTouch Fire


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Amazon Fire Phone Amazon Fire Phone


  • Big display (4.7 inches)
  • High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
  • High pixel density screen (315 ppi)
  • Quad core processor
  • Fast mobile data support (4G)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable

Common for both Pros & Cons

none

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OneTouch Fire Alcatel OneTouch Fire


  • Low pixel density screen (165 ppi)
  • Low resolution display (320 x 480 pixels)
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low-resolution video capture
  • No front-facing camera

Apple iPhone 4 Apple iPhone 4


  • High pixel density screen (326 ppi)
  • Small dimensions (4.50 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Battery is not user replaceable
  • Proprietary USB connector - have to use its cable instead of a standard microUSB

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Single-core processor
  • Too little RAM memory (256 MB RAM vs 512 MB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels vs 5 megapixels)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories