x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Phone RivalsClick on a rival to jump to it.

Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)

Apple iPhone 4s Apple iPhone 4s


  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches vs 4.54 x 2.31 x 0.37 inches)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Alcatel OneTouch POP C1 Alcatel OneTouch POP C1


  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.5 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 165 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Alcatel OT-890 Alcatel OT-890


  • No front-facing camera
  • Single-core processor
  • Low-resolution camera (2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 143 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches vs 4.35 x 1.85 x 0.53 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 114 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call

Samsung Galaxy 3 Samsung Galaxy 3


  • No front-facing camera
  • Low-resolution camera (3 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The camera lacks flash
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches)
  • Lacks Wi-Fi

Sony Ericsson Aspen Sony Ericsson Aspen


  • Hardware QWERTY keyboard
  • No front-facing camera
  • Too little RAM memory (0.25 GB RAM)
  • Low-resolution camera (3.2 megapixels)

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi vs 167 ppi)

in-depth comparison



Alcatel OT-818 Alcatel OT-818


  • Lacks Wi-Fi
  • The touchscreen uses resistive technology, which is not responsive
  • The camera lacks autofocus
  • The camera lacks flash
  • Does not support automatic screen brightness
  • Lacks a proximity sensor that turns the display оff during a phone call
  • Low pixel density screen (146 ppi)

Apple iPhone 5 Apple iPhone 5


  • Large camera sensor pixel size (1.4 μm)
  • Lacks microSD slot for storage expansion
  • Proprietary USB connector

Common for both Pros & Cons

  • Small dimensions (4.31 x 2.10 x 0.48 inches vs 4.87 x 2.31 x 0.30 inches)

in-depth comparison



More Rivals

Latest stories